In democratic systems like
Brazil, where seats in the lower house of the national legislature are
allocated proportionally, there are usually many political parties elected to
govern. Because of this, none of them attains a majority in the legislature
necessary to pass laws and form a cohesive government. In these systems, parties
and interest groups generally band together to form coalitions. Two or three
parties or groups usually ally together to form a bloc. These parties agree to
vote support one another’s legislative priorities and vote for each other’s
bills after unifying around a similar ideology or policy agenda. Golder gives a
thorough analysis of the importance and influence of coalitions in the German
political system by examining the possible coalitions that could have formed
after the 2005 German elections in her article.
Golder argues that the German
electoral system makes it difficult for small parties to form coalitions
against the largest parties and therefore led to the grand coalition between
the CDU and SPD in 2005. In a similar manner, the Brazilian electoral system influences
which coalitions form. For example, one of Brazil's most serious institutional
challenges is "coalitional presidentialism", a system in which the
president must form and govern over a multiparty coalition, which becomes more
difficult the more parties are involved. There are more
than eight political parties in the Brazilian legislature with more than 5
percent of the seats. Because of this, Brazil’s electoral system requires
the president to do a lot of political bargaining in order to maintain
a coalition.
Through the late 1990s and early 2000s, democracies in Latin
America experienced a strong move to the left as socialist governments came to
power. These governments nationalized industries, increased social spending,
provided large benefits to workers, and implemented radical political agendas.
This rise of the left was given the name of the “pink
tide”. However, large-scale corruption scandals and economic decline
greatly discredited these leftist governments. As the strength of these leftist
parties has waned, conservative Brazilian parties have become more popular.
Brazil is one country that has experienced a shift to the right after
the ebb of the pink tide. Since the 2014 elections, Brazil has been governed by
the so-called “Bible, beef, and bullets” lobby. This coalition
is made up of evangelical Christian politicians and interest groups, the farm
lobby and conservative lawmakers determined to ease strict firearms controls. The
farm lobby, backed by the booming agribusiness sector, won
42 percent of the seats in Brazil’s lower house, the Chamber of Deputies, and
one quarter of the seats in the Senate. Evangelical Christian lawmakers won
a further 76 of the 513 seats in the Chamber of Deputies, greatly due to
financial assistance from Brazil’s fast-growing Pentecostal churches. The ideological alliance between the evangelicals, farmers, and
gun lobby is made up of lawmakers from many different political parties.
However, these lawmakers chose to ally with one another to form a coalition
because they vote similarly on social and economic issues. These groups consistently
opposed the advance of gay rights and reproductive rights for women. They
united together with a common
goal to pass conservative legislation. Now they want to restrict gay rights
and abortion, lower the age of criminal responsibility and advance farmers’
interests in conflicts with Indian tribes.
These three groups agreed to support Michel Temer’s presidency in
exchange for the executive branch’s support in achieving these policy goals
despite his possible implication in the Petrobras corruption scandal that
brought about the impeachment of his predecessor, Dilma Rousseff. It seems that
the coalitions efforts to achieve these policy objectives are succeeding. Bills
to relax Brazil’s strict gun laws, reduce the age of criminal responsibility to
16 years old, and ban abortion even in cases of rape are passing
in Brazil’s lower house. Furthermore, a bill to undo key parts of Brazil’s
2003 Disarmament Law, which was praised as a key step toward containing crime
and robbery in cities was passed
in committee last year.
A spokesman for President Temer’s government said
that his cabinet voiced its support for most of the Bible, beef, and bullet’s
lobby’s agenda. In a further move to consolidate his support among members of
this coalition, President Temer appointed Blairo
Maggi as Minister of Agriculture. Maggi is the owner of the Brazilian company
Ammagi Group, the world’s largest soybean producer.
Although the Bible, beef, and bullets coalition in currently
ruling Brazil, President Temer faces the difficult prospect of keeping the
coalition together. Some members of the coalition are beginning to oppose his
presidency because of the strong evidence that he was involved in the Petrobras
scandal. Some also argue that his efforts to bring about economic reform and
end the current crisis is not working. Temer barely survived a vote
in the lower house to put him on trial for corruption charges.
In conclusion, the large number of parties in the Brazilian
political system causes the Brazilian president to have difficulty controlling
the governing coalitions. The decreasing popularity of the leftist parties in
Latin America has also caused conservative parties to rise and allowed for the
formation of the Bible, beef, and bullets lobby. Only time will tell if
President Temer can maintain this coalition and keep his party in control of
the presidency.


No comments:
Post a Comment