On June 15th President Donald Trump tweeted “Almost
One Million people request tickets for the Saturday Night Rally in Tulsa,
Oklahoma!”. Yet on the night of the rally, June
20th, numbers revealed the actual attendance of approximately 6,200 scanned ticket holders at a venue
able to hold 19,000. The massive discrepancy between registered ticket
requests and individuals in attendance initially baffled the Trump campaign and
many onlookers; however, TikTok users were not surprised. In the days leading
up to the event TikTok users moved collectively to reserve thousands of tickets
in a no-show protest. This plan, well executed and unanticipated by party and
election officials, represents more than a one-off event. Many participants
were teenagers, still unable to vote in the upcoming November election, who are
seeking ways to make their political concerns heard without the ability to cast
a ballot. The availability of social media networks has opened doors for
cooperation and collaboration among young citizens of the United States that
has been unheard of previously. This evolution calls for a reevaluation of how
political organizations and movements are evolving in the United States, and
whether they meet the needs of a rising generation seeking to have their voice
be heard.
In 1992
Gerald Pomper published an article entitled Concepts
of Political Parties, attempting to examine models and political parties
based on three criteria: a focus on either elite or mass populations,
collective or coalitional goals, and an instrumental or expressive mode. Focus
refers to the population being served by the group, either a smaller group of
elites or the public masses. Collective goals indicate those that require
united action and provide benefits for everyone involved, while coalitional
goals need concerted effort with rewards that are typically applicable only for
those within the coalition. An instrumental mode is rational and calculable,
including features such as paid employees or tangible benefits to
participation. Expressive mode groups offer mostly intangible benefits focusing
on strong internal solidarity, ideological agreement, and a sense of community.
Pomper
categorized both major political parties in the United States today as
bureaucratic organizations with elite focus, coalitional goals, and an
instrumental mode. He wrote that “this concept seems increasingly applicable to
the United States as the national parties develop professional staffs, large
financial resources and technical expertise” (p. 151). Both the Republican and
Democratic parties, and the campaigns they assist in running, have adapted
formal structure and a full-time staff with tangible benefits for voters, such
as the closed Republican primary. By contrast, the work of TikTok activists
culminated in what Pomper would classify as a social movement: a body of people
with mass focus, collective goals, and an expressive mode. Far less formal, the
online leaders of the Tulsa no-show protest aimed to reach the masses through
their demonstration with intangible emotional rewards for their actions. This
approach to registering concern with President Trump’s re-election campaign has
multi-faceted implications.
Organizers
cited both ideological and structural reasons for participating in the no-show
protest. The policy priorities and previous track record of the President has
left individuals across the political spectrum feeling misrepresented,
frustrated, or unsafe under the current administration. In addition, the Trump
re-election campaign strategy revolves strongly around in person rallies in the
midst of a pandemic. In the three weeks after Trump’s rally in Tulsa, which was
held even after locals
expressed concern about the safety of such a
gathering, Oklahoma reported
a record high in positive COVID-19 cases. For a variety of reasons,
the bureaucratic model of political involvement is not working for Generation
Z, which hold significant future implications for politicians with
significantly different ideologies and political institutions with more
traditional models of operation.
As
Generation Z begins to vote in this and future elections, both politicians and
parties will need to be prepared to adapt to and appropriately address a
population favoring a social movement structure to politics. Younger Americans
tend to be more collaborative, invest more in collective goals, seek mass
involvement and representation, and connect deeply to their ideological beliefs
even as many struggle to identify with a political party. The long term
implications remain to be seen, but even now the immediate results of the Tulsa
no-show protest are beginning to ripple through this presidential election:
President Trump’s scheduled rally in New Hampshire on July 11, 2020 was postponed
due to concerns of inclement weather and campaign worries about low turnout.
No comments:
Post a Comment